It wasn't so long ago that I was talking about the risky nature of The Open Standard, Mozilla's online publication covering the ins and outs of the open web. It was a risky proposal, not because Mozilla lacked the resources or couldn't chime in on the space, but rather that it shouldn't.
A truly 'open web' hasn't quite arrived yet, and until it does the concept remains an ideal that shouldn't be compromised by its foremost representative. Mozilla does a stellar job of embodying what that future could look like, but the opinions of the many journalists contributing to The Open Standard clouded what was ultimately the open web's standard-bearer.
For this reason and/or perhaps many others that occurred behind the scenes, The Open Standard is no more, now represented only by a statement page published on Mozilla's news page. Was it a venture inevitably doomed from the start, or was it an issue in execution? In any case, brand positioning has been maintained at Mozilla.